Sunday, October 31, 2010

Big Breaking News!

See that girl?  That's Erica Nalder.
See that ring?  I put it on her finger yesterday.
See the smiles on our faces?  That's because we're going to spend eternity forever.
Want to know how it all went down and when we're getting married?  Watch:

17 comments:

  1. Nate, congratulations! What a lovely video presentation. Peter and I are very happy for you two. We can't wait to meet Erica!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Great video, Amazing story, Perfect couple. Congrats!!!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Woohoo! Congratulations! Erica is such a cute girl--you are very lucky. I'm excited to meet her at Christmas.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I love you two! Can't wait for the wedding in SLC!!! And the video was so cute!

    ReplyDelete
  5. When I proposed to Jackie, they didn't cheer and clap- someone yelled "Get a Room." Breakfast at Chik-fil-a? Really?

    ReplyDelete
  6. So excited to meet you Erika! Congrats to you both!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Nate, I should have known. I was in church today when I got an e-mail from you saying Breaking News and I just had to take a peak! What could he be up to now? Did he get the story of his lifetime!? Well, I guess ya did! Congratulations! So happy for you both.

    ReplyDelete
  8. You crack me up! Congrats, now you will be part of the family.

    ReplyDelete
  9. It's about time Nate! Erica is one lucky girl!

    ReplyDelete
  10. Yea!! I get another sister! And one I really like.
    Looking forward to the wedding.
    We love you both.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Wahoo! I LOVE that video! Awesome! And good job Nate! She's a good one. :)

    ReplyDelete
  12. Congratulations Nate! I'm so happy for you guys!

    ReplyDelete
  13. Congratulations! You two are so cute together!

    ReplyDelete
  14. Congratulations to you both! Exciting times!!

    ReplyDelete
  15. Nate - thank you for openly sharing.You'll find over time other men will start mocking the romance and closing up themselves. Block it out - But, remember, you are having so much more fun and closeness than they are.

    ReplyDelete